Flemish Pride

December 21st, 2009

In the corner of a garage in Lede, Belgium, there are a dozen boxes stacked to the ceiling. Each box contains hundreds of small yellow flags with the black Flemish lion. This is the flag of the people, not the government. This is the identity of a culture that for centuries others have tried tirelessly to eradicate. When I speak with Ghislain, the owner, about bike racing, I speak of the favorites to win. He speaks of the Belgians. When he asks if I would like a beer, I am served a Westmalle Dubbel, his favorite Flemish beer. There are thousands of garages like this, and owners like Ghislain, many of whom I’ve met. They form the backbone of Flemish life, a culture that, unless you embrace, you risk remaining an outsider.

On May 25, 1913, Belgian sports writer Karel Van Wijnendaele organized the first Tour of Flanders, crossing Dutch-speaking Belgium because “all Flemish cities had to contribute to liberate the Flemish people”. At the time, it was very important to give recognition to the Flemish, and the creation of the race did just that. De Ronde is as much a part of the heritage of the Flemish people as the processions of Veurne and Bruges, the Last Post at the Menin Gate of Ypres or the ship blessing at Ostend. This race is the most celebrated of all the Flemish festivals, and no other creates such an atmosphere, such a popular fervor. Flemish riders say to win, you need heart. If you feel Flanders in your blood, you feel the pain less in your legs.

While images of the Tour of Flanders conjure tales of heroic efforts across windswept cobbles and up mud soaked hills, for anyone who has ridden in these conditions, the effort is more damage control and survival, and any hint of heroism is aimed at trying to overcome the madness that has placed one in this position to begin with. There is a sense of romance about the places the Tour of Flanders passes through, a sense that there exist these utopian villages with shrines erected to memorialize the suffering. Iconic symbols must certainly mark this hallowed ground, designating the holy spots of our sport that those who live at the curbside must recognize and value. The truth is, yes, and no. Yes, they are significant locations in the world of cycling, but to the local population, they are only a small part of the important theme of every discussion cycling ultimately touches on here- life in Flanders.

My feeling is this classic has survived intact because it was created for the people, ridden through the working man’s terrain, and meant to represent the people. It is not a marketing exercise or an upper class social event that caters to the wealthy, yet relies on the working class for support. There are rules, of course, and they are bent by many, but followed by the majority. There is a controlled chaos on the first Sunday every April that has one simple goal – to celebrate Flanders and the Flemish people. The roads are raced on for a few days of the year, but worked on every day. Tractors, cars and trucks, hauling hay, cattle, fruit and vegetables. Unlike the Tour de France, the heart of this masterpiece remains the same and the beauty of its content has been refined over time. Now, the biggest change is which climbs are excluded and what is the order ridden. But there is no grand announcement of the course, no invitation to attend a lavish ceremony in an ornately decorated theater, complete with speculators and prognosticators. It hasn’t been marginalized by TV, marketing, instant television heroes, or Lance Armstrong. “As a Belgian, winning Flanders for the first time is far more important than wearing the maillot jaune in the Tour” said Johan Museeuw, who accomplished both. Imagine the feeling that comes with winning the Tour of Flanders three times.

I can look at a map of the major mountain stages of the Tour and see exactly what the route is doing. To do this with Flanders means knowing the tiny roads and in doing so is to know the people, the culture, and understanding everyday life beyond bike racing. The beautiful part of looking at a race course and immediately envisioning the race-day strategy and knowing the small roads and villages it goes through is perhaps like being able to read music. While those who listen can appreciate the song, those who can read music and understand the score can better appreciate the symphonic nuances.

For Flanders, it’s the every day roads of rural life and agricultural lifestyle that suddenly become the story line for a modern bike race. There’s a left turn before the Paterberg when the road suddenly narrows to barely the width of a tractor. The twisting descent begins with a view looking across at the crest of the climb, and finishes with a sharp right hand turn at the bottom, best taken wide to the left to ease the transition onto the steep cobbles. On the Holleweg kasseien there is a paved section on the far left just next to the gutter 100 meters from the end. After 3200 meters of bone jarring cobbles, this is a stretch worth fighting for.

The route that connects the Oude Kwaremont, Paterberg, Koppenberg, Steenbeekdries, Taaienberg and Eikenberg is as beautiful a stretch as exists in bike racing. And that beauty is as visual as it is ephemeral. While we expect to see TV coverage of the ascent of the Koppenberg and the Muur, the excitement is somewhat muted by these expectations. It is the secrets that lay in the fields, draped across the hillsides, and hidden in village corners that I am connected to. And it is here that I memorize hundreds of images that flash by in a second, and when linked together create a perfectly edited film, repetitively viewed while counting down the days until spring.

A Principal of Authority

December 3rd, 2009

Growing up in New Jersey, the Newark Star-Ledger was our local newspaper and the sports section was a daily accompaniment to my breakfast. I even had a paper route when I was thirteen, my Sunday morning deliveries capped off by driving lessons with my father. Each morning of my adolescence and teen years started with reading Jerry Izenberg at Large. He was as entertaining as he was provocative, fearless in his criticism of teams, coaches, players and organizations and exultant in his praise. Though he was one of many across the country, he established himself as a principal of authority with literary prose that made me laugh, cry and most importantly, connect. I still have a copy of his August 3rd, 1979 column of New York Yankees catcher Thurman Munson, killed the day before in a plane crash.

Cycling is in both an awkward, and enviable, position. Being relatively young on the modern American sports scene there has yet to be an established voice that resonates with the necessary criticism and praise within the sport and the industry. With cell phones, text messaging, email blasts, facebook, twitter and blogs, everyone has the tools to suddenly express their opinions. But just because I ride a bike doesn’t instantly make me an expert on frame design, and more importantly, doesn’t put me in a position to condemn other manufacturers that I may believe are inferior.

There are many self-labeled experts, granting themselves authority on every debatable topic, and some have become quite successful, albeit for different reasons. Zagat’s is probably the best example. While it’s a fantastic survey tool, Zagat is not an authority on restaurants, just on surveys. Robert Parker has rightfully established himself as an authority on wine, and Andrew Harper (a pseudonym) has spent 30 years establishing himself as an authority on travel.

So who is the principal of authority in cycling? Over the past few weeks, much of the “drama” written has centered on rumors and news for the sake of, or lack of, news. In the span of one week, multiple articles circulating the web covered the returns of Michael Rasmussen and Alexander Vinokourov, which grand tour Carlos Sastre might ride and banned doper turned confessor Bernard Kohl opening a bike shop in Vienna. Just because someone says it, and posts it, doesn’t necessarily make it newsworthy, or even interesting for that matter. Do any of the journalists recall Vinokourov lambasting the sport as he tested positive for blood doping during the 2007 Tour de France? Do these same journalists remember Rasmussen acting like a child, lying to everyone about his whereabouts during that same Tour? Just because these riders are returning doesn’t mean we have to excuse what they did, provide the fanfare to celebrate their return, or patronize their new bike shop. Perhaps the bigger story should be the lifetime ban of Austrian Christian Pfannberger. But in the time this story was released on Cyclingnews.com on Sunday Nov. 22, to Monday November 23 at noon, there were already 16 additional news posts.

The transmittance of information has become so instantaneous, there is little time for anything important to sink in before the next news item is posted. How about the doctor that was recently convicted on six counts of injuring two cyclists with his car? Why has there not been more written on this? Who are the editors, columnists, journalists covering this? Outside of Patrick Brady’s detailed reporting from the trial, no one. And that is a shame. Is News for the sake of news, or for the sake of putting up something to satisfy our craving for instant information, worthy, or just information? What is our culture of cycling? What importance does it have beyond trying to create a media superstar or increase product sales? We already suffer from information overload, perhaps its time to slow down and provide less information. Through better journalism, deliver something poignant, something to ponder, something that makes me laugh, makes me cry, makes me feel connected.

I still listen to sports on the radio. There is something about a pictureless broadcast that transcends the visual image, allows me to paint my own colorful picture, and constructs more drama. There have been hundreds of blogs written about Phil Liggett, Paul Sherwen and Bob Roll for their lack of insightful race coverage and pointless verbosity. Regardless of the work they do and the commentary they provide, I don’t need a voice to go with the spectacular images of the peloton hammering over the cobbles of Roubaix or ascending Alpe d’Huez. I simply press mute and select the appropriate music.

When the Legend Becomes Fact, Print the Legend.

November 20th, 2009

June 10, 1949. Mario Ferretti’s words crackled over the radio, barely audible behind an annoying hiss that very nearly cancelled out a piece of cycling history- “a man alone is leading… his jersey is white and baby blue. …..his name is Fausto Coppi.”  Fausto Coppi went on to win stage 17 by nearly 12 minutes and with it the 32nd Giro d’Italia.  The stage was from Cuneo to Pinerolo over 254 kilometers and included the Colle della Maddalena, Colle del Montginevro, Col de Vars, Col d’Izoard and Sestriere.  According to Aldo Grasso, it was the birth of the modern day cycling legend.

Aldo Grasso is a Professor of History of Radio and Television at the Catholic University of Milan and a columnist and television critic for the Italian newspaper Il Corriere Della Sera.  His lecture “Girogirontondo: 100 years of the Giro d’Italia. A History of Italy Through Bicycle Heroes and Storytellers” at New York Univerty’s Casa Italiana Zerilli-Marimo was a far too brief look at the important role the Giro d’Italia plays in Italian culture since its inception in 1909.

The connection of a few cyclists as an integral piece of cultural identification that coincided with the most significant events of Italian history of the 20th century shows that the Giro is about much more than fashionable pink clothing and attractive podium girls.  As Coppi’s heroics were so poetically transmitted, the descriptive prose invited the listener and reader to create their own view of bicycle racing and its heroes.  It compares with the literary works of Homer; the journey and the conquest; words that resonate like a symphony or remind the devout of a biblical verse.

In post World War I Italy, many heroes and legends were either warriors or biblical figures.  Alfredo Binda was the first the media catapulted to heroism, providing honor and glory to cycling in a post war society that was starved for cultural identity.  Binda’s exploits didn’t disappoint either, as he won the Giro 5 times between 1925 and 1933-including 41 stages-and was crowned the first ever world champion, a title he would capture two more times.  The popularity of the Giro was fueled by the growth of the media, and at the heart of this growth were the journalists that populated the imaginations of the readers, and set the stage for each year’s race to be the next round in heroic conquests.  

The modernization of post World War II Italy moved slowly.  In 1946, there were 3,000,000 bikes in Italy, and 147,000 automobiles.  In 1947, there were 3.5 million bikes, and only 148,000 automobiles.  Sport was slowly returning as a way to see new modern heroes, and the Giro gave the country a visual story that connected people and reconnected a culture ravaged by war.  Fausto Coppi represented a new national spirit of Italy, as the country positioned itself towards a more complex and industrialized nation. The well-known and well-documented battle between Coppi and Gino Bartali was as much about Italian life as it was about victories, the old world farmer vs. the new world modernist.  Post World War II euphoria was taking hold, and this interested the media. Writing in this period flourished with the adjectives journalists used to describe the exploits of these newborn heroes, and populate the imagination with the exploits of the sport and weave it into everyday life. The first half of the 20th century ended with Mario Ferretti placing a country squarely on the shoulders of Coppi.  The late journalist Dino Buzzati so eloquently documented this cultural transition in what ultimately was published in 1998 as Coppi vs. Bartali at the 1949 Giro d’Italia.  When the legend becomes fact, Mr. Grasso stated, print the legend. 

Italy’s Cycling Heroes: Turn on Your Television

It took 20 more years, but by 1969, the introduction of television was the primary media to transcribe the day to day movement of the race.  This brought the heroes into the living room and animated the rivalry of Felice Gimondi and Eddy Merckx.  The transmission of images of Merckx crying on screen as he defended himself against a positive doping test was the pivotal moment that removed the hero from ones imagination and placed him in your living room.  While this continued to locate heroes in everyday life, it began to diminish the imaginative and creative forces that one uses, and places the promotion and development of the race squarely on the set schedule of TV.  Following another 30 years, and the first tragic hero of modern media was escorted out of a hotel in Madonna di Campiglio while leading the Giro.  Marco Pantani was the first made for TV hero, both built up by TV media, and ultimately destroyed by it.  The tragic hero obtains his legendary status only after his death Mr. Grasso pointed out emphatically. 

The 21st Century: The Need for Authority

Where the journalist succeeded with words to paint his hero, the TV show fails to inspire.  Ones imagination, and memory recall, is no longer active.  The aspiration is then not to create a legend, but to become a television hero. There is no longer the need for the descriptors and adjectives to describe the exploits of what we have just seen on television. Television has killed the principal of authority, those voices that created the legends. There is no longer an authority of the sport, no voice, nothing to grasp, no imagination.  It is scripted to fit into a time slot, and its extraordinary visual images transcribe something lifeless and numbing.

The basic principal of the bicycle has changed very little.  The invention continues to provide a significant connection to people and to those whose exploits they witness.  The Italians believe sport is deeply cultural, Mr. Grasso concluded.  It is an integral part of western culture, and there is a sense of nobility about the aggressive instincts, all of which are metaphors for life. “If this is not culture, then tell me what is?”

2010 Update: Giro d’Italia and Dauphine-Libere October 19th

November 20th, 2009

As the off season approaches and attention turns to 2010, the hottest topics on everyone’s mind are the routes of the Grand Tours- the Tour de France released its route last week, and while we will NOT be returning to see the Tour in 2010, we will again be viewing what we consider to be a more accessible, and exciting, race- the Dauphine-Libere. Our race viewing typically consists of two stages, and next year the race announced it will have a stage finish on Alpe d’Huez. This is very exciting, as we often ask why the race doesn’t cover one of the most storied climbs in the Alps. We will ride the climb ahead of the race and view the stage finale, which is sure to produce the winner of this 1 week stage race. As additional details become available, we will update our trip page and our latest news.

The 2010 route of the Giro d’Italia will be announced this Saturday, October 24th, and there has been wild speculation across the internet news sites about where it will go, what climbs it will take in, and where it will finish. Two things are certain at this point: it will start in Amsterdam, and it will not finish in Milan. Inside sources have put us in a position to tentatively outline two itineraries- May 9-16th and May 23rd to May 31st. Our first trip will be a Spring Training week in Tuscany. I recently toyed with the idea of a spring training week to Tuscany that coincided with the Monte Paschi Eroica race in March, and according to reports, we will get ourt wish in May as the race will cover some of the strade bianche on its way to finishing in Siena. The following day’s stage will start in Grosetto, and we will be on hand to view both, as well as ride the Eroica course. Our trip will begin in the hills of Chianti, move to the Val d’Orcia before finishing on the banks of the Arno and the beautiful city of Florence. This is a perfect itinerary for those looking for a relaxed tour with some early season miles (as much and as little as you wish), some exciting race viewing, and of course great hotels, food and wine.

Our second itinerary will beging and end in Erbusco, which is situated between Bergamo and Brescia. While specific race viewing details will be finalized early next week, we are planning on seeing 4 stages, including the final time trial in Verona. There is speculation that the race will climb the Gavia and the Mortirolo, and the city of Brescia will host a stage finish and start on consecutive days. Our riding days will include the passes of the Gavia, Mortirolo, Presolana, Gardena, Mendola among others.

More details top follow next week, and a new Giro trip page will up as well. If you have any questions before then, please email or call.

~ Peter